I have heard two schools of thought on this.

The first school says that habitual (often unconscious) patterns of thought (mostly erroneous beliefs caused by painful experiences) hold you back, and that gaining understanding and insight into how those thoughts and beliefs originated can help you release them and free your mind for accomplishing greather things. This is generally accomplished by some form of therapy, whether that is self-therapy (such as meditation, or Eugene Gendlin's focusing technique) or any of the various forms of psychotherapy.

The second school says that it is counterproductive to dwell on past negative thoughts and beliefs, and that dwelling on positive beliefs, thoughts and actions will eventually cause the old beliefs to shrivel and fade away. This is also the "feel the fear and do it anyway" school, because it acknowledges that your old beliefs will resist your efforts to move forward, and you may not understand at first what is causing the fear.

I know the advocates of Abraham-Hicks teachings will say that the latter approach is preferable, but is there still value in gaining insight about your past?

asked 07 Jan '10, 19:50

Vesuvius's gravatar image


I think too that it might depend on exactly what the individual has repressed. If there is a lot of repressed trauma from the past I have a feeling that maybe the former school of thought might be appropriate but if the repressed material is not too traumatic then maybe the latter would be more appropriate. What might be easy for one person to release, may require a lot more work and help for another to release depending on their personality type so I don't think there is a right or wrong answer to this. Interesting question.

Thanks for the link to Gendlin's site. I had read about this before but never got around to looking into it, so thanks for the reminder :-)


answered 08 Jan '10, 01:05

Michaela's gravatar image


I have read both school of thoughts, both have relevance, and can be useful to the person. The second approach seems more practical, but what is right for one person may not be right for another, so it would be up to the individual to decide how far they want to go with this, and what the benefits of doing one or the other are?


answered 08 Jan '10, 00:43

Inactive%20User's gravatar image

Inactive User ♦♦

Click here to create a free account

If you are seeing this message then the Inward Quest system has noticed that your web browser is behaving in an unusual way and is now blocking your active participation in this site for security reasons. As a result, among other things, you may find that you are unable to answer any questions or leave any comments. Unusual browser behavior is often caused by add-ons (ad-blocking, privacy etc) that interfere with the operation of our website. If you have installed these kinds of add-ons, we suggest you disable them for this website



Asked: 07 Jan '10, 19:50

Seen: 913 times

Last updated: 08 Jan '10, 01:05

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here



Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or _italic_
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text](http://url.com/ "title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported

Related Questions