On the subject of Encounters with Extraterrestrial and UFO Crashes, if so what are your thoughts on this subject matter?

Book description from Amazon.com

MAJIC EYES ONLY is the most authoritative and comprehensive chronicle ever published on the subject of worldwide UFO crashes and subsequent military retrievals from 1897 to the present.

The author guides the reader through 74 UFO crash incidents supported by compelling evidence in the form of official documents, eyewitnesses and in some cases physical evidence. Since 1984, multiple sources have leaked, revealed or discovered some 3,500 pages of UFO documents, hundreds classified Top Secret and linked to Majestic-12.

These MJ-12 documents, coupled with the Leonard Stringfield data and strong investigations by other case experts, provide a powerful core of UFO crash incidents.

asked 09 Oct '10, 01:01

Inactive%20User's gravatar image

Inactive User ♦♦
6121179

edited 10 Oct '10, 17:55

Vesuvius's gravatar image

Vesuvius
30.4k121113


im not sure if this is the correct answer as ive not read the book i thought the first sighting was in 1916, 5 years after nikola tesla patented his anti gravity machine, cigar or saucer shaped could travel at any speed and could carry any payload,

the ufos that have been seen have strangely only ever been cigar or saucer shaped as i said the first official ufo was seen 1916 5 years after the patent released by tesla,

the power that the ufos run on is teslas ionospheric electricity basically look up wardencliffe tower you will then see why theres so much metal on top of our buildings, ever wondered why the eiffel tower or the blackpool tower just look like large antennae cos thats exactly what they are giant electricity conductors.

link

answered 26 Jul '11, 22:46

Dave%201's gravatar image

Dave 1
511

Well I would of like to give you two points for your answer, but I am only allowed to give one point at a time. Thank you for the information.

(28 Jul '11, 05:09) Inactive User ♦♦

Hello Dave, i very much like the image of the eiffel tower acting as a giant conductor though i doubt that many french would believe it :)

(22 Dec '11, 12:16) blubird two



well vee i have not read the book. but i have read the majestic 12 document in 1991. alot of it make sense. nothing as been prove or disprove. but from what is coming out these days about military experiment that took place it seams that the document is not so far from the truth. also i remember that this document talked about the death of jfk and it was said that the driver shoted him and that is why the brain fell on the back of the car. and that there was a film of it where you did see it. and from the test that they made about the official version of oswald shooting jfk the 10 best elite shooter in the world could not have made that shoot. and if it would have been made like that the brain would not have fall on the back of the car. experience and enjoy.

here is a link http://www.v-j-enterprises.com/mj12.html

http://www.majesticdocuments.com/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majestic_12

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_John_F._Kennedy

http://www.youtube.com/verify_age?next_url=http%3A//www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3D3Ep1sJwohWE%26feature%3Drelated

Even after weeks of practice and intensive training, Oswald barely managed to qualify at the level of "Sharpshooter," the middle of three rifle qualification levels in the Marines. He obtained a score of 212, two points above the minimum for the "Sharpshooter" level. In other words, even after extensive training and practice, and even though he was firing at stationary targets with a semi-automatic rifle and had plenty of time to shoot (even during the so-called "rapid-fire" phase), Oswald narrowly missed scoring at the lowest possible qualification level.

The next time Oswald fired for record in the Marines, he barely managed to qualify at all, obtaining a score of 191, which was one point above the minimum needed for the lowest qualification level, "Marksman." To put it another way, he came within two points of failing to qualify. As mentioned, no rifle test has ever included all of the factors under which Oswald would have fired. What would, therefore, constitute a valid "Oswald" rifle test? What would a test need to include in order to qualify as a genuine simulation of Oswald's alleged shooting feat? Such a test would include the following conditions:

  • The riflemen cannot have scored above the level of "Sharpshooter" in the Marines (or in the Army).

  • The riflemen must have little target practice during the forty days prior to the test.

  • The riflemen must have been known to be somewhat uncoordinated while in the Marines (or in the Army).

  • The riflemen cannot have any "practice shots" on the day of the test.

  • The riflemen must use the alleged murder weapon itself, or another Carcano with a difficult bolt and an odd trigger pull.

  • If a different Carcano is used, it must be established, by expert shooters who fire the rifle just to see how fast it can be operated (with or without minimal accuracy), that the weapon cannot be fired faster than 2.3 seconds per shot.

  • The target silhouette must be mounted on a car.

  • The car carrying the target must be the same size and shape as Kennedy's limousine.

  • There must be a tree that is the same size as the oak tree in Dealey Plaza on 11/22/63 and that is in the same position in relation to the window and the road on which the target car is moving.

  • The riflemen must fire from a window that is open by no more than 15 inches.

  • The window from which the riflemen shoot must have two pipes to its left on the inside. These pipes must be positioned so that they inhibit the riflemen from firing markedly to their right. To get an idea of the degree to which the pipes would have inhibited a sharply rightward shot, see Jim Marrs, CROSSFIRE, New York: Carroll and Graf, 1989, seventh photo page, and Robert Groden, THE KILLING OF A PRESIDENT, New York: Viking StudioBooks, 1993, p. 125; cf. Harrison Livingstone, KILLING THE TRUTH, New York: Carroll and Graf, 1993, second page of second photo set.)

  • The riflemen must fire from an elevation of 60 feet.

  • The riflemen must score at least two hits out of three shots in less than 6 seconds ON THEIR FIRST ATTEMPT.

  • If the riflemen are given 8.4 seconds to fire, then they must so misaim their first shot that they COMPLETELY MISS the target car.

  • If the riflemen are given 8.4 seconds to fire, not only must they completely miss the target car with their initial shot, but they must also score at least two hits out of their next two shots ON THEIR FIRST ATTEMPT.

  • If the riflemen are given 8.4 seconds to fire, they CANNOT deliberately miss the entire target car with their first shot (or with any shot, for that matter), but must miss the whole car without trying to do so.

  • The target car must travel the same speeds that the limousine was traveling, and at the appropriate points, from frames 140-313 of the Zapruder film.

No "Oswald" rifle test has ever included all of these conditions. On this basis alone it can be said that no rifleman, no matter how skilled, has ever duplicated Oswald's supposed shooting feat.

The conditions listed above are entirely factual and will not be disputed by anyone familiar with the assassination. Personally, I would add the following two factors, which, though supported by good evidence, are disputed by lone-gunman theorists:

  • The riflemen must have a shield of boxes behind them that allows them no more than 30-32 inches in which to kneel and fire. (Photos of the supposed sniper's nest show that a gunman would have had no more than 30-32 inches in which to kneel.)

  • The riflemen must fire two of their shots in no more than 1.5 seconds. (Numerous witnesses, from all over the plaza, said that two of the shots came so closely together that they were almost simultaneous. Some witnesses even said they sounded like a single burst from an automatic rifle.)

In closing, I quote from an internal Warren Commission memo that was written by Commission attorney Wesley Liebeler. Liebeler was commenting on the various rifle tests that were done for the Commission, on the marksmen who took part in them, and on the way in which those tests were being cited as "evidence" that Oswald could have done the shooting:

The fact is that most of the experts were much more proficient with a rifle than Oswald could ever be expected to be, and the record indicates that fact. . . . To put it bluntly, that sort of selection from the record could seriously affect the integrity and credibility of the entire report. . . . [These] conclusions will never be accepted by critical persons anyway.

http://www.kenrahn.com/jfk/the_critics/griffith/Oswald_poor_shot.html

link

answered 15 Sep '11, 02:29

white%20tiger's gravatar image

white tiger
19.7k1744

edited 29 Sep '11, 04:26

Click here to create a free account

Tags:

×58
×40
×6

Asked: 09 Oct '10, 01:01

Seen: 1,266 times

Last updated: 22 Dec '11, 08:22








Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here

By RSS:

Answers

Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or _italic_
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text](http://url.com/ "title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported



Related Questions