Mirror neurons as seen in this video explain that you can feel someone else pain by seeing and mimic them. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_SDvafWRiU
what happens when you do not see them and feel their pain? like someone could be in the same room hidden from you and you feel their pain. or someone that you have cross path with on the street a fee minutes ago. or you could be in a room with more then one person and feel their back pain. yet none of them made a move or say a word to suggest to you that they have back pain. then if it is not mirror neurons effect what is it? is it simply that you feel them with no physical correspondence? then you would have to say that the energy communicate from one person to another with no physical feed back. what do you think about this?
if someone is able to see or feel stuff from afar with no physical sense then it is not only about mirror neurons.
then it would be about the energy that communicate with those mirror neurons. would you not agree? even in the case of seeing something with the physical eyes require light and light is energy. so the mirror neurons would actually be related to decipher the light information. and work both way to reference them self to one and the other to have a reference point. because with no reference point you cannot make any comparison. will also say that with one eye you cannot have a reference point on the deep but with 2 eyes you have a reference point on the deep. your two eyes and the ball in front of you make a trigonometry example: to catch a ball with only one eyes you have hard time to know where it is in distance to you and where it is exactely since you have only 2 point of reference the eye and the ball but with 2 eyes and the ball you have 3 point of reference. so you can more precisely calculate is exact position.
asked 15 Jan '14, 16:52
There's a problem with Ramachandran's logic. Let's walk through it.
This last point (#5) is where his logic begins to break down.
Remember, Ramachandran already stated that the reason the sensory neurons fire in someone else's brain when they see someone else being pricked is that the observer's brain is constructing a model of the event from what they saw. No unseen metaphysical connection is required to accomplish this, and therefore it's not possible to draw any conclusions about what might happen if the "observer" doesn't actually see the event with his own eyes.
This of course, doesn't disprove that mirror neurons could somehow be involved in telepathy or remote viewing, but Ramachandran's explanations don't provide any evidence either. He himself describes the purpose of these neurons as having a modeling function that works through the ordinary senses, not some form of telepathy.
Note that Ramachandran himself clarifies the issue in the same talk, when one of the audience members asks him how mirror neurons are related to telepathy. His answer: they aren't:
To hear Ramachandran respond to the audience member, go to this page, scroll down the list of topics in the center of the page until you get to "Nothing Psychic About Mirror Neurons", and click on the link provided.
What about pineal gland? Have you ever consider that as an option for communicating without the "physical eyes"
answered 26 Sep '15, 17:39
If you are seeing this message then the Inward Quest system has noticed that your web browser is behaving in an unusual way and is now blocking your active participation in this site for security reasons. As a result, among other things, you may find that you are unable to answer any questions or leave any comments. Unusual browser behavior is often caused by add-ons (ad-blocking, privacy etc) that interfere with the operation of our website. If you have installed these kinds of add-ons, we suggest you disable them for this website