This question is marked "community wiki".

as you can see in this video they are going to do the same thing again. last time they have throw 2 particle together to get a spark now they are going to do it again at faster speed. in the stone ages stone man also cast stone together being fascinated by seeing spark. do you think that doing it more extremely this time will give you different result?

how much does it cost to do that experiment? is it that you do not have enough pieces of puzzle to put together that you need to make more? could you not have solved other problem with that money? if you hope to find god doing that experiment you now what is going to happen he will tell you: you double minded man when will you learn and stop casting stone did you think that by taking the smallest stone possible I would not see it? you dowers of inequity I never knew you. but you have more chance to please someone else and find that one. he would probably tell you to change those stone in to bread to feed your self with it. if you did that people would listen to you. you would have power in this world. that is what people want they kill them self and other for it.

with babel tower man was confuse in is language. when they casted a arrow in the cloud from the top of their tower. now you cast small stone at extreme speed together to find God or dark matter.

what do you think about the lhc?

asked 10 Jan '14, 21:20

white%20tiger's gravatar image

white tiger

What is this? Are you saying this is an invention of the devil himself? Is this the machine he needs to launch the apocalypse? I don't know much about this or what it does, but that video makes it sound like some bad weapon. It will open the pit of hell, why would they want to do this and why all our governments want it? This reminds me of when Satan offered Jesus the entire Earth if he would admit defeat and bow his head.

(11 Jan '14, 03:07) Wade Casaldi

If this machine is designed to open the pit of hell, why aren't the Christians around the world upset? This should be big news of what this machine is made for.

The more I think on this, it reminds me of the legend of Pandora's box!

(11 Jan '14, 03:18) Wade Casaldi

When God saw that they acted so madly, he did not resolve to destroy them utterly, since they were not grown wiser by the destruction of the former sinners [in the Flood]; but he caused a tumult among them, by producing in them diverse languages, and causing that, through the multitude of those languages, they should not be able to understand one another.

(11 Jan '14, 05:09) white tiger

The place wherein they built the tower is now called Babylon, because of the confusion of that language which they readily understood before; for the Hebrews mean by the word Babel, confusion...

(11 Jan '14, 05:09) white tiger

When Prometheus stole fire from heaven, Zeus took vengeance by presenting Pandora to Epimetheus, Prometheus' brother. With her, Pandora was given a beautiful jar - with instructions not to open it under any circumstance. Impelled by her curiosity (given to her by the gods), Pandora opened it, and all evil contained therein escaped and spread over the earth.

(11 Jan '14, 05:46) white tiger

She hastened to close the container, but the whole contents had escaped, except for one thing that lay at the bottom - the Spirit of Hope named Elpis.[6] Pandora, deeply saddened by what she had done, feared she would have to face Zeus' wrath, since she had failed her duty; however, Zeus did not punish Pandora, because he knew this would happen. yes satan offer jesus power over the earth yet he said it himself they kill each other for it. so he offer jesus a Pandora box.

(11 Jan '14, 05:48) white tiger

white tiger, perhaps another interpretation is more accurate, satan or the our matrerial aspect constantly challenges the father of our spiritual aspect. to who do we give obesiance, does our mind know our christos

(11 Jan '14, 06:33) fred

@fred I do not think the father is challenged. I think more that the children keep doing the same thing expecting different result. does the Christo that you are know is mind and heart? if stone man cast stone together and see spark. and scientist from today cast particle one against the other to see spark. is it not the same pattern even if they have bigger tools and more precise measuring device? as for Satan if he needs Jesus to bow down to him to praise him self to show is power and-

(11 Jan '14, 07:21) white tiger

give Jesus power over other so that they kill him. does it not show that Satan power is illusion and ignorance. if he would have real power he would not seek other people downfall for is own praise.

(11 Jan '14, 07:27) white tiger

Your video about this machine doesn't make sense. I mean was this on the news that they said the machine if successful will open the pit? I thought Jesus had the keys to hell, these scientist are trying to basically jail break the devil?

This sounds more like the plot to a good science fiction movie than reality. Is there anything else about this maybe a little more official, maybe something from the government?

(11 Jan '14, 15:17) Wade Casaldi

Consider that there is a distinct possiblity that it is not from the devil at all. :)

(11 Jan '14, 23:52) lozenge123

well apart from seeing small pieces of stuff from crashing stuff together at high speed at the high cost that it cost in material and energy. is it helping people did it feed the poor? did it give shelter to the poor? did it lower the price of something you need to buy for your survival? did it stop people from making war in this world? did it cure the sick? The Large Hadron Collider is nearly 30 years in the making - and costs the member countries of CERN and other

(12 Jan '14, 09:17) white tiger

participating countries an estimated €4.6 billion (about US$ 6.4 billion). The United Kingdom, for example, contributes £34 million per year. The United States contributed approximately $531 million to the development and construction of components for the LHC (with the US Department of Energy shelling out $450 million and the National Science Foundation kicking in the remaining $81 million).

(12 Jan '14, 09:19) white tiger

@wade casildi it is cern that made that the lhc. The European Organization for Nuclear Research (French: Organisation européenne pour la recherche nucléaire), known as CERN (/ˈsɜrn/; French pronunciation: ​[sɛʁn]; see History) is an international organization whose purpose is to operate the world's largest particle physics laboratory.

(12 Jan '14, 09:19) white tiger

Established in 1954, the organization is based in the northwest suburbs of Geneva on the Franco-Swiss border, (

46°14′3″N 6°3′19″E) and has twenty European member states. Israel is the first non-European country granted full membership.[2]

(12 Jan '14, 09:32) white tiger
showing 0 of 15 show 15 more comments

The earth is not flat.
The moon is not made of cheese.
The earth is not the center of the universe.
The earth is more than 10000 years old.
Thank you science
Keep up the good work.


answered 14 Jan '14, 03:01

ursixx's gravatar image



@Ursixx The moon certainly looks quite cheese like though so I can see how they might have thought that! Happy Tuesday.

(14 Jan '14, 04:16) Catherine

@Cathrine and might be a nice place for a day out ;)

(14 Jan '14, 04:50) ursixx

Good point and said with a good bit of levity. Could there be another conspiracy since the sixties and the government is hiding that the moon really is made of Swiss Cheese? Hahaha

You do have a point if science stopped every time there was fear nothing would have been discovered.

(14 Jan '14, 12:00) Wade Casaldi

ursixx, as it was in the beginning, religion, philosophy and science were as one circle of knowledge, it will be again

(15 Jan '14, 05:53) fred

@Fred I hope so. @Ursixx Ah W&G - thanks for that.

(15 Jan '14, 05:58) Catherine
showing 2 of 5 show 3 more comments

@white tiger - I actually think that it's money well-spent. CERN has already discovered the Higgs Boson which could help us build spaceships that could travel at or past the speed of light one day. I am happy to put some of my tax dollars to endeavors such as that and what NASA is doing. My country does not ignore social services; we spend far more, in fact, on that--more than $1.5 trillion, nearly half of the federal budget:


Here is another peek at the potential fruits that this sort of research could give us, in our own lifetime:

releaser99 has also just recently elucidated in eloquent terms, how giving money and goods away is the least beneficial and empowering methods to help others.

Besides, I know that I am getting a nice return on my investment in NASA when my mornings are brightened by videos like this... :)


answered 12 Jan '14, 12:34

lozenge123's gravatar image


edited 12 Jan '14, 12:40

well @lozenge is the money really yours? since you need to work for it and buy stuff with it? also if some people are poor or sick is it that the money is not serving all of us? why do we need to find parallel universe is it that we have solve all the problem in here that we could solve? giving money for a good perpace is always good what the person use the money for sometime is not always good. what is the cause ignorance, miss placed value error lack of truth?

(12 Jan '14, 14:23) white tiger

@white tiger - Perhaps all of your new questions could be asked as new IQ questions, as there is really not enough space here to adequately address them all, especially vast topics such as the nature of money, etc.. I was simply answering your question, "what do you think of the lhc?"

(12 Jan '14, 14:37) lozenge123

@lozenge would you then say that the point of origin contain more then the point of containment? or that the point of containment benefit from the point of origin? or should I solve this division by saying that both benefit from one and the other and are still growing in balance and harmony?

(12 Jan '14, 14:51) white tiger
(12 Jan '14, 17:35) lozenge123

Wow this music video was real! I thought it was special effects, so cool!

(13 Jan '14, 02:23) Wade Casaldi

Also thanks for the more official link, I now understand this a little more and it now seems exciting futuristic news. Not something to fear but something that could change earth as we know it.

(13 Jan '14, 02:35) Wade Casaldi

@Wade Casaldi - Glad you liked them, Wade! Happy to oblige.

(15 Jan '14, 01:53) lozenge123
showing 2 of 7 show 5 more comments

I love science. I am very curious, and I love finding out things about science and the way the universe works. I think that science, for a lot of people, is a very non-resistant form of expansion, because no matter what answers you get, it's thrilling. You know, the LHC discovers the God particle: AWESOME! The LHC discovers that on a quantum level we're all made of monkeys: NO WAY! In fact, science seems like a minor exception to the Abraham idea that "asking questions you don't know the answers to" tends to kick you out of the Vortex, to me: trying to find the answers to science questions I don't know is a really enjoyable activity to me.

For some people, it seems that science can feel nervewracking (ie - I am very into vaccines, I think they are super great and awesome and clearly the answer to questions many people were asking for a long time. Other people think vaccines are the cause of X, and feel a lot of fear about them.) but for me, and nerds of my ilk, science is just a very exciting, fun way of sifting through the reality (or "reality", if you will - it's all a game, right?) of life.

One of the things I loooooove about science as a worldview is that you will never reach the end of understanding. There will always be a new level of understanding waiting to be discovered. I find that really exciting and inspiring! So I love the LHC!


answered 12 Jan '14, 21:00

corduroypower's gravatar image


This video explains what the LHC is (Large Hadron Collider)- just in case you were wondering.

I am also extremely interested in these experiments, and highly doubt that anything evil is afoot here. We NEED to do this- for the future of Mankind, and also to answer questions about our past.

I highly doubt that there is any idea about opening the Gates of Hell or anything like that.

Just pure science- no conspiracies here!

Jai ♥


answered 12 Jan '14, 19:10

Jaianniah's gravatar image


@Jaianniah Wow honey, I liked this very informative video much more than that conspiracy video. Yes they didn't say anything about a pit here, it is fascinating that they are trying to discover about our universe. Other than that they didn't say anything about practical application other than curiosity.

(13 Jan '14, 02:15) Wade Casaldi

"Why do we need this, when people are starving in [some third-world country]?"

It's a common refrain. The answer is twofold:

  1. Pure research (like the LHC) may not seem practical in and of itself, but it throws off all sorts of practical technologies. The cell phone in your pocket wouldn't even be possible without Quantum Mechanics. The computer or tablet you are reading this text with is a direct descendant of the Apollo Guidance Computer we used to get to the moon.
  2. Hunger is a political/logistical problem, not a matter of insufficient resources. We already have enough food to feed every man, woman and child on the planet.

Richard Bach once wrote:

There was a thing on television a while ago, a scientist researching what it is that makes a violin sound the way it does, I thought what does the world need with that? Millions of people starving, who needs violin research?

Then I thought no. The world needs models, people living interesting lives, learning things, changing the music of our time. What do people do with their lives who are not struck down with poverty, crime, war? We need to know people who have made choices that we can make, too, to turn us into human beings. Otherwise, we can have all the food in the world, and so what?


answered 15 Jan '14, 15:15

Vesuvius's gravatar image


edited 15 Jan '14, 15:28

Love that Bach quote. This feels very apropos to thinking of life as a continual opportunity for expansion into interesting new things, instead of wanting to find a perfect static reality and holding on to it.

(15 Jan '14, 15:21) corduroypower

do you think that poverty is only in some third-world country? you would be surprise to know that they are some poor in all country. so according to you the world needs model? so you think that people are poor because they do not have models to follow? if poverty is not a matter of insufficient resource then it is a matter of what we do with the resource? you said: We already have enough food to feed every man, woman and child on the planet. then why are some poor and not feed?

(15 Jan '14, 15:50) white tiger

Some are poor and not fed for political and logistical reasons, like I said. Sure, I know there are poor in every country; I stated third-world country because that's the kind of country that people think about when they think of people going hungry, and third-world countries illustrate the sharp divide that exists with respect to distribution of wealth.

(15 Jan '14, 16:48) Vesuvius

Look at it this way: pure research allows us to find better ways to grow food for those that are hungry, better ways to make clothing for those that have none, and better ways to cure illnesses for those who are sick, including the ones in third-world countries. It's not just that we need to do more for those people; we need to do it better and smarter. Pure research benefits everyone.

(15 Jan '14, 16:50) Vesuvius
showing 2 of 4 show 2 more comments
Click here to create a free account

If you are seeing this message then the Inward Quest system has noticed that your web browser is behaving in an unusual way and is now blocking your active participation in this site for security reasons. As a result, among other things, you may find that you are unable to answer any questions or leave any comments. Unusual browser behavior is often caused by add-ons (ad-blocking, privacy etc) that interfere with the operation of our website. If you have installed these kinds of add-ons, we suggest you disable them for this website

Related Questions